The Drawback of Horizontal Tooth Displacement

This Fossil Friday options the skeleton of the Miocene mammal Neoparadoxia cecilialina, which is on show on the Pure Historical past Museum of Los Angeles County. This species belongs to the extinct order Desmostylia, which is an enigmatic group of Tertiary mammals that had an amphibious way of life just like fashionable hippos. 

Desmostylia have typically been thought-about to be shut relations of sirenians (manatees) and proboscideans (elephants) (Reinhart 1953) inside a standard clade referred to as Tethytheria (McKenna 1975, Domning et al. 1986, McKenna & Bell 1997). This was disputed by a phylogenetic examine of Cooper et al. (2014, additionally see Beatty & Cockburn 2015), who prompt that desmostylians are basal odd-toed ungulates (Perissodactyla). After all, this speculation must dismiss all of the similarities with Tethytheria as convergences, which appears fairly implausible. Nevertheless, different new proof once more supported a tethytherian relationship (Gheerbrant et al. 2016). Subsequently, desmostylian affinities are nonetheless thought-about controversial till at the present time (Matsui & Tsuihiji 2019). Phylogenetics time and again proves to be a relatively “comfortable” science, if it may be referred to as a science in any respect. We’ll come again to this query.

Anyway, with Desmostylia not less than the genus Desmostylus additionally has some sort of horizontal tooth alternative (Santos et al. 2016, contra Domning et al. 1986), just like the potential relations of Desmostylia, sea-cows and elephants. Certainly, this phenomenon represents a real drawback for neo-Darwinism.

Right here Is Why

If Darwinian evolution is true, we must always anticipate that congruent derived similarities in fashionable representatives of given lineages are confirmed as homologies within the floor plan of those lineages when early fossil representatives are studied. In different phrases: similarities in fashionable relations ought to return to their frequent ancestor. In lots of instances the precise reverse is the case, the sample of similarity present in fashionable species dissolves into a large number of incongruent homoplasy of their earlier fossil representatives. 

A great instance is discovered within the mammal clade Tethytheria, which incorporates fashionable elephants and sea-cows (sirenians). Elephants and sea-cows, although fairly totally different in habitus and lifestyle, are thought-about to be most carefully associated (sister teams) primarily based on quite a few shared derived characters just like the place of a single pair of teats on the breast, a two-pointed spherical coronary heart, cranium buildings, and many others. In addition they share a singular kind of tooth alternative: They lack everlasting premolars, and as these cheek tooth put on down and fall out, they’re changed by new cheek tooth that slowly shift ahead from behind alongside the dentary in a sort of “conveyor belt” method. This distinct mode has been referred to as horizontal tooth displacement.

The similarities between sirenians and elephants had been first acknowledged in 1836 by the French naturalist Henri de Blainville, who labeled them collectively in a bunch referred to as “les gravigrades.” Blainville was particularly impressed by the shared mode of horizontal tooth alternative. Such a horizontal tooth alternative is just shared by current elephants and manatees, however absent in virtually all different mammals, in order that it could naturally be interpreted as a trait inherited by the frequent ancestor of Tethytheria. To this point so good.

Or Not So A lot

A primary indication that the mode of tooth alternative could also be a convergence could possibly be the truth that amongst residing sirenians it is just current in manatees however not in dugongs (Mitchell 1973, Marsh 1980). Nevertheless, this would possibly as properly signify a secondary discount because of the degenerate cheek tooth of dugongs (Lanyon & Sanson 2006).

One other potential indicator of convergence may be the truth that, opposite to a standard false impression within the literature, the mode of horizontal tooth alternative in manatees and elephants is just not actually an identical (Domning & Hayek 1984, Beatty et al. 2012): in elephants the alternative (“mesial drift”) is proscribed to simply three regular molars (Roth & Shoshani 1988, Sanders 2018), whereas manatees add supernumerary molars so long as they dwell (Domning 1982, Domning & Hayek 1984). After all, the latter mode might simply be an extension of the previous, in order that this distinction doesn’t exclude homology per se. A fair earlier precursor state may be the eruption of everlasting tooth properly previous sexual maturity, which may be very unusual in mammals generally, however present in some afrotherian mammals akin to elephants, sirenians, and hyraxes (Asher & Lehmann 2008).

Sadly, the fossil file revealed much more incongruence that undoubtedly closed the case in favor of convergence: horizontal tooth alternative is just present in Neogene elephants (Sanders 2018), however not in older and extra primitive fossil proboscideans. Amongst fossil sirenians solely the trichechine genera Ribodon and Trichechus had horizontal tooth alternative (Beatty et al. 2012, Self-Sullivan et al. 2014). Lastly, in Desmostylia a lot of the dozen genera other than Desmostylus present no indication of horizontal tooth alternative. The distinctive horizontal tooth alternative in Desmostylus, manatees, and elephants clearly originated independently in every of those three lineages and doesn’t help their shut relationship.

A Window into the Previous

With out the good thing about fossil file as window into the previous, we’d by no means have suspected this. The obvious homologous sample of derived similarity (so-called synapomorphy), congruent with different information, evaporated underneath nearer scrutiny, and needed to be defined away as convergent or parallel improvement. What number of different similarities would possibly mislead us to deduce frequent descent?

In spite of everything, convergence turned out to be way more frequent than believed within the golden period of neo-Darwinism, previous to the genomic revolution. That is additionally confirmed by the invention of horizontal tooth alternative just like manatees in two very far eliminated species, the Australian rock wallaby or Nabarlek (Peradorcas concinna) (Thomas 1904: 226, Sanson 1989), and the African rodent Heliophobius argenteocinereus (Gomes Rodrigues et al. 2011, Gomes Rodrigues & Šumbera 2015). 

Such hanging convergences have usually been talked about as drawback for Darwinian evolution, as a result of organic similarities are incongruently distributed amongst organisms. However in examples just like the horizontal tooth alternative the issue appears to go even deeper, as a result of the incongruences are clustered in teams which might be considered carefully associated primarily based on different proof, in order that the relationships appear to be strengthened by false homologies. Nature seems to be misleading. Are Darwinists bothered by such issues? By no means: Saether (1979) even boldly declared this bug to be a function and referred to as it “underlying synapomorphies.” So, can phylogenetics be thought-about a severe scientific self-discipline? Not in keeping with any cheap measure.

References

• Asher RJ & Lehmann T 2008. Dental eruption in afrotherian mammals. BMC Biology 6:14, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-14.
• Blainville HMD de 1836. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences, séance du 20 mars 1836, vol. IV, p. 426.
• Beatty BL & Cockburn TC. 2015. New insights on probably the most primitive desmostylian from a partial skeleton of Behemotops (Desmostylia, Mammalia) from Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35(5):e979939, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2015.979939.
• Beatty BL, Vitkovski T, Lambert O & Macrini TE 2012. Osteological Associations With Distinctive Tooth Growth in Manatees (Trichechidae, Sirenia): A Detailed Have a look at Trendy Trichechus and a Overview of the Fossil Report. The Anatomical Report 295(9), 1504–1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22525.
• Cooper LN, Seiffert ER, Clementz M, Madar SI, Bajpai S, Hussain ST & Thewissen JGM 2014. Anthracobunids from the Center Eocene of India and Pakistan Are Stem Perissodactyls. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109232, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109232.
• Domning DP 1982. Evolution of manatees: A speculative historical past. Journal of Paleontology 56(3), 599–619. JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/steady/1304394.
• Doming DP & Hayek L-AC 1984. Horizontal tooth alternative within the Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis). Mammalia 48(1), 105–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1984.48.1.105.
• Domning DP, Ray CE & McKenna MC 1986. Two new Oligocene desmostylians and a dialogue of Tethytherian systematics. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 59(59), 1–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810266.59.1.
• Gheerbrant E, Filippo A & Schmitt A 2016. Convergence of Afrotherian and Laurasiatherian Ungulate-Like Mammals: First Morphological Proof from the Paleocene of Morocco. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0157556, 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157556.
• Gomes Rodrigues H & Šumbera R 2015. Dental peculiarities within the silvery mole-rat: an unique mannequin for finding out the evolutionary and organic origins of steady dental era in mammals. PeerJ 3:e1233, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1233.
• Gomes Rodrigues H, Marangoni P, Sumbera R, Tafforeau P, Wendelen W & Viriot L 2011. Steady dental alternative in a hyper-chisel tooth digging rodent. PNAS 108(42), 17355–17359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109615108.
• Lanyon JM & Sanson GD 2006. Degenerate dentition of the dugong (Dugong dugon), or why a grazer doesn’t want tooth: morphology, occlusion and put on of mouthparts. Journal of Zoology 268(2), 133–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00004.x.
• Marsh H 1980. Age dedication of the Dugong (Dugong dugon (Müller)) in Northern Australia and its organic implications. Report Worldwide Whaling Fee (Particular Subject) 3(3), 181–201. https://www.researchgate.internet/publication/240628646
• Matsui Okay & Tsuihiji T 2019. The phylogeny of desmostylians revisited: proposal of recent clades primarily based on sturdy phylogenetic hypotheses. PeerJ 7:e7430, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7430.
• McKenna MC 1975. Towards a Phylogenetic Classification of the Mammalia. pp. 21–46 in: Luckett WP & Szalay FS (eds.). Phylogeny of the primates: a multidisciplinary strategy. Proceedings of WennerGren Symposium no. 61, Burg Wartenstein, Austria, July 6–14, 1974. Plenum Press, New York (NY). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2166-8_2.
• McKenna MC & Bell SK 1997. Classification of Mammals above the Species Degree. Columbia College Press, New York (NY), xii+631 pp.
• Mitchell J 1973. Willpower of relative age within the dugong Dugong dugon (Müller) from a examine of skulls and tooth. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 53(1), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1973.tb01409.x.
• Reinhart R 1953. Analysis of the New Mammalian Order, Desmostylia. The Journal of Geology 61(2), 187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/626067.
• Roth VL & Shoshani J. 1988. Dental identification and age dedication in Elephas maximus. Journal of Zoology 214(4), 567–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb03760.x.
• Saether OA 1979. Underlying Synapomorphies and Anagenetic Evaluation. Zoologica Scripta 8(1-4), 305–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1979.tb00644.x.
• Sanders WJ 2018. Horizontal tooth displacement and premolar prevalence in elephants and different elephantiform proboscideans. Historic Biology 30(1-2), 137–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1297436.
• Sanson GD 1989. Morphological diversifications of tooth to eating regimen and feeding within the Macropodoidea. pp. 151–168 in: Grigg G, Jarman P & Hume I (eds). Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-kangaroos. Vol. 1. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton (NSW).
• Santos G-P, Parham JF & Beatty BL 2016. New information on the ontogeny and senescence of Desmostylus (Desmostylia, Mammalia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 36(2):e1078344, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2016.1078344.
• Self-Sullivan C, Domning DP & Velez-Juarbe J 2014. Evolution of the Sirenia. http://67.59.130.204/sirenianevolution.pdf
• Thomas O 1904. On a set of mammals made by Mr. J. T. Tunney in Arnhem Land, Northern Territory of South Australia. Novitates Zoologicae 11, 222–229. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/half/26833