Jeppsson, Ok., Kanno, T., Shirahige, Ok. & Sjögren, C. The upkeep of chromosome construction: positioning and functioning of SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 601–614 (2014).
Gligoris, T. & Löwe, J. Structural insights into ring formation of cohesin and associated Smc complexes. Developments Cell Biol. 26, 680–693 (2016).
Alt, A. et al. Specialised interfaces of Smc5/6 management hinge stability and DNA affiliation. Nat. Commun. 8, 14011 (2017).
Adamus, M. et al. Molecular Insights into the structure of the human SMC5/6 advanced. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 3820–3837 (2020).
Palecek, J., Vidot, S., Feng, M., Doherty, A. J. & Lehmann, A. R. The Smc5-Smc6 DNA restore advanced: bridging of the Smc5-Smc6 heads by the kleisin, nse4, and non-kleisin subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 36952–36959 (2006).
Kanno, T., Berta, D. G. & Sjögren, C. The Smc5/6 advanced is an ATP-dependent intermolecular DNA linker. Cell Rep. 12, 1471–1482 (2015).
Aragón, L. The Smc5/6 advanced: new and outdated features of the enigmatic long-distance relative. Annu. Rev. Genet. 52, 89–107 (2018).
Palecek, J. J. SMC5/6: multifunctional participant in replication. Genes 10, 7 (2019).
Palecek, J. J. & Gruber, S. Kite proteins: a superfamily of SMC/kleisin companions conserved throughout micro organism, archaea, and eukaryotes. Construction 23, 2183–2190 (2015).
De Piccoli, G. et al. Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break restore by selling sister-chromatid recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1032–1034 (2006).
Potts, P. R., Porteus, M. H. & Yu, H. Human SMC5/6 advanced promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin advanced to double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25, 3377–3388 (2006).
Ampatzidou, E., Irmisch, A., O’Connell, M. J. & Murray, J. M. Smc5/6 is required for restore at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 9387–9401 (2006).
Betts Lindroos, H. et al. Chromosomal affiliation of the Smc5/6 advanced reveals that it features in in another way regulated pathways. Mol. Cell 22, 755–767 (2006).
Menolfi, D., Delamarre, A., Lengronne, A., Pasero, P. & Branzei, D. Important roles of the Smc5/6 advanced in replication by pure pausing websites and endogenous DNA harm tolerance. Mol. Cell 60, 835–846 (2015).
Li, X. & Heyer, W.-D. Homologous recombination in DNA restore and DNA harm tolerance. Cell Res. 18, 99–113 (2008).
Bermúdez-López, M. et al. The Smc5/6 advanced is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6502–6512 (2010).
Kegel, A. & Sjögren, C. The Smc5/6 advanced: greater than restore? Chilly Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 179–187 (2010).
Jeppsson, Ok. et al. The chromosomal affiliation of the Smc5/6 advanced will depend on cohesion and predicts the extent of sister chromatid entanglement. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004680 (2014).
Kegel, A. et al. Chromosome size influences replication-induced topological stress. Nature 471, 392–396 (2011).
Decorsière, A. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein identifies the Smc5/6 advanced as a bunch restriction issue. Nature 531, 386–389 (2016).
Murphy, C. M. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein promotes degradation of SMC5/6 to boost HBV replication. Cell Rep. 16, 2846–2854 (2016).
Li, T., Robert, E. I., van Breugel, P. C., Strubin, M. & Zheng, N. A promiscuous α-helical motif anchors viral hijackers and substrate receptors to the CUL4–DDB1 ubiquitin ligase equipment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 105–112 (2010).
Abdul, F. et al. Smc5/6 antagonism by HBx is an evolutionarily conserved operate of hepatitis B virus an infection in mammals. J. Virol. 92, e00769-18 (2018).
van Breugel, P. C. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein stimulates gene expression selectively from extrachromosomal DNA templates. Hepatology 56, 2116–2124 (2012).
Dupont, L. et al. The SMC5/6 advanced compacts and silences unintegrated HIV-1 DNA and is antagonized by Vpr. Cell Host Microbe 29, 792–805.e6 (2021).
Gibson, R. T. & Androphy, E. J. The SMC5/6 advanced represses the replicative program of high-risk human papillomavirus sort 31. Pathogens 9, 786 (2020).
Nagy, G. et al. Motif oriented high-resolution evaluation of ChIP-seq information reveals the topological order of CTCF and cohesin proteins on DNA. BMC Genomics 17, 637 (2016).
Sutani, T. et al. Condensin targets and reduces unwound DNA constructions related to transcription in mitotic chromosome condensation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7815 (2015).
Taylor, E. M., Copsey, A. C., Hudson, J. J. R., Vidot, S. & Lehmann, A. R. Identification of the proteins, together with MAGEG1, that make up the human SMC5-6 protein advanced. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 1197–1206 (2008).
Harvey, S. H., Krien, M. J. & O’Connell, M. J. Structural upkeep of chromosomes (SMC) proteins, a household of conserved ATPases. Genome Biol. 3, reviews3003.1 (2002).
Arumugam, P. et al. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin’s affiliation with chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1941–1953 (2003).
Hirano, M., Anderson, D. E., Erickson, H. P. & Hirano, T. Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions. EMBO J. 20, 3238–3250 (2001).
Guerineau, M. et al. Evaluation of the Nse3/MAGE-binding area of the Nse4/EID household proteins. PLoS ONE 7, e35813 (2012).
Hudson, J. J. R. et al. Interactions between the Nse3 and Nse4 elements of the SMC5-6 advanced determine evolutionarily conserved interactions between MAGE and EID households. PLoS ONE 6, e17270 (2011).
Vondrova, L. et al. A task of the Nse4 kleisin and Nse1/Nse3 KITE subunits within the ATPase cycle of SMC5/6. Sci. Rep. 10, 9694 (2020).
Venegas, A. B., Natsume, T., Kanemaki, M. & Hickson, I. D. Inducible degradation of the human SMC5/6 advanced reveals a necessary function solely throughout interphase. Cell Rep. 31, 107533 (2020).
Jo, A., Li, S., Shin, J. W., Zhao, X. & Cho, Y. Construction foundation for shaping the Nse4 protein by the Nse1 and Nse3 dimer throughout the Smc5/6 advanced. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166910 (2021).
Zabrady, Ok. et al. Chromatin affiliation of the SMC5/6 advanced depends on binding of its NSE3 subunit to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 1064–1079 (2016).
Duan, X. et al. Structural and useful insights into the roles of the Mms21 subunit of the Smc5/6 advanced. Mol. Cell 35, 657–668 (2009).
Solé-Soler, R. & Torres-Rosell, J. Smc5/6, an atypical SMC advanced with two RING-type subunits. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 2159–2171 (2020).
Zhao, X. & Blobel, G. A SUMO ligase is a part of a nuclear multiprotein advanced that impacts DNA restore and chromosomal group. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4777–4782 (2005).
Jacome, A. et al. NSMCE2 suppresses most cancers and growing older in mice independently of its SUMO ligase exercise. EMBO J. 34, 2604–2619 (2015).
Andrews, E. A. et al. Nse2, a element of the Smc5-6 advanced, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA harm. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 185–196 (2005).
Pond, Ok. W., de Renty, C., Yagle, M. Ok. & Ellis, N. A. Rescue of collapsed replication forks depends on NSMCE2 to forestall mitotic DNA harm. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007942 (2019).
Potts, P. R. & Yu, H. Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA restore. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7021–7032 (2005).
Zapatka, M. et al. Sumoylation of Smc5 promotes error-free bypass at broken replication forks. Cell Rep. 29, 3160–3172.e4 (2019).
Boulanger, M., Chakraborty, M., Tempé, D., Piechaczyk, M. & Bossis, G. SUMO and transcriptional regulation: the teachings of large-scale proteomic, modifomic and genomic research. Molecules 26, 828 (2021).
Ni, H. J. et al. Depletion of SUMO ligase hMMS21 impairs G1 to S transition in MCF-7 breast most cancers cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 1893–1900 (2012).
Niu, C. et al. The Smc5/6 advanced restricts HBV when localized to ND10 with out inducing an innate immune response and is counteracted by the HBV X protein shortly after an infection. PLoS ONE 12, e0169648 (2017).
Potts, P. R. & Yu, H. The SMC5/6 advanced maintains telomere size in ALT most cancers cells by SUMOylation of telomere-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 581–590 (2007).
Pebernard, S., Wohlschlegel, J., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R. third & Boddy, M. N. The Nse5-Nse6 dimer mediates DNA restore roles of the Smc5-Smc6 advanced. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 1617–1630 (2006).
Yu, Y. et al. Integrative evaluation reveals distinctive structural and useful options of the Smc5/6 advanced. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026844118 (2021).
Räschle, M. et al. Proteomics reveals dynamic meeting of restore complexes throughout bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 348, 1253671 (2015).
Bustard, D. E. et al. Throughout replication stress, non-Smc ingredient 5 (Nse5) is required for Smc5/6 protein advanced performance at stalled forks. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 11374–11383 (2012).
Leung, G. P., Lee, L., Schmidt, T. I., Shirahige, Ok. & Kobor, M. S. Rtt107 is required for recruitment of the SMC5/6 advanced to DNA double strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26250–26257 (2011).
Oravcová, M. et al. Brc1 promotes the focal accumulation and SUMO ligase exercise of Smc5-Smc6 throughout replication stress.Mol. Cell. Biol. 39, e00271-18 (2019).
Etheridge, T. J. et al. Dwell-cell single-molecule monitoring highlights necessities for steady Smc5/6 chromatin affiliation in vivo. eLife 10, e68579 (2021).
Gutierrez-Escribano, P. et al. Purified Smc5/6 advanced displays DNA substrate recognition and compaction. Mol. Cell 80, 1039–1054.e6 (2020).
Wilhelm, L. et al. SMC condensin entraps chromosomal DNA by an ATP hydrolysis dependent loading mechanism in Bacillus subtilis. eLife 4, e06659 (2015).
Hu, B. et al. ATP hydrolysis is required for relocating cohesin from websites occupied by its Scc2/4 loading advanced. Curr. Biol. 21, 12–24 (2011).
Serrano, D. et al. The Smc5/6 core advanced is a structure-specific DNA binding and compacting machine. Mol. Cell 80, 1025–1038.e5 (2020).
Hu, B. et al. Qri2/Nse4, a element of the important Smc5/6 DNA restore advanced. Mol. Microbiol. 55, 1735–1750 (2005).
Båvner, A., Matthews, J., Sanyal, S., Gustafsson, J.-Å. & Treuter, E. EID3 is a novel EID member of the family and an inhibitor of CBP-dependent co-activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3561–3569 (2005).
Corpet, A. et al. PML nuclear our bodies and chromatin dynamics: catch me for those who can! Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 11890–11912 (2020).
Bauer, B. W. et al. Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion by a ‘swing and clamp’ mechanism. Cell 184, 5448–5464.e22 (2021).
Bürmann, F. et al. A folded conformation of MukBEF and cohesin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 227–236 (2019).
Lee, B. G. et al. Cryo-EM constructions of holo condensin reveal a subunit flip-flop mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 743–751 (2020).
Varejão, N. et al. Structural foundation for the E3 ligase exercise enhancement of yeast Nse2 by SUMO-interacting motifs. Nat. Commun. 12, 7013 (2021).
Bermúdez-López, M. et al. ATPase-dependent management of the Mms21 SUMO ligase throughout DNA restore. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002089 (2015).
Everett, R. D. The spatial group of DNA virus genomes within the nucleus. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003386 (2013).
Michelini, Z., Negri, D. & Cara, A. Integrase faulty, nonintegrating lentiviral vectors. Strategies Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 614, 101–110 (2010).
Cuchet-Lourenço, D., Vanni, E., Glass, M., Orr, A. & Everett, R. D. Herpes simplex virus 1 ubiquitin ligase ICP0 interacts with PML isoform I and induces its SUMO-independent degradation. J. Virol. 86, 11209–11222 (2012).
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Strategies 11, 783–784 (2014).
