Adams, J. A., Gopher, D. & Lintern, G. Results of visible and proprioceptive suggestions on motor studying. J. Mot. Behav. 9, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193127501900204 (1977).
Proteau, L. On the specificity of studying and the position of visible data for motion management. Adv. Psychol. 85, 67–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62011-7 (1992).
Ossmy, O. & Mukamel, R. Notion as a route for motor talent studying: Views from neuroscience. Neuroscience 382, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.016 (2018).
Saunders, J. A. & Knill, D. C. People use steady visible suggestions from the hand to manage each the path and distance of pointing actions. Exp. Mind Res. 162, 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2064-1 (2005).
Ossmy, O. & Mukamel, R. Neural community underlying intermanual talent switch in people. Cell Rep. 17, 2891–2900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.009 (2016).
Ossmy, O. & Mukamel, R. Brief time period motor-skill acquisition improves with measurement of self-controlled digital arms. PLoS ONE 12, e0168520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168520 (2017).
Ossmy, O. & Mukamel, R. Behavioral and neural results of congruency of visible suggestions throughout short-term motor studying. Neuroimage 172, 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.020 (2018).
Bergouignan, L., Nyberg, L. & Ehrsson, H. H. Out-of-body–induced hippocampal amnesia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 4421–4426. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318801111 (2014).
Gauthier, B. et al. First-person physique view modulates the neural substrates of episodic reminiscence and autonoetic consciousness: A purposeful connectivity research. Neuroimage 223, 117370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117370 (2020).
Bréchet, L. et al. First-person view of 1’s physique in immersive digital actuality: Affect on episodic reminiscence. PLoS ONE 14, e0197763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197763 (2019).
Bréchet, L. et al. Subjective feeling of re-experiencing previous occasions utilizing immersive digital actuality prevents a lack of episodic reminiscence. Mind Beh. 10, e01571. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1571 (2020).
Iriye, H. & Ehrsson, H. H. Perceptual phantasm of body-ownership inside an immersive lifelike setting enhances reminiscence accuracy and re-experiencing. iScience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103584 (2021).
Braun, N. et al. The senses of company and possession: A evaluate. Entrance. Psychol. 9, 535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535 (2018).
Ishikawa, R., Ayabe-Kanamura, S. & Izawa, J. The position of motor reminiscence dynamics in structuring bodily self-consciousness. Iscience 24, 103511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103511 (2021).
Kim, C.-S., Jung, M., Kim, S.-Y. & Kim, Okay. Controlling the sense of embodiment for digital avatar purposes: strategies and empirical research. JMIR Critical Video games 8, 21879. https://doi.org/10.2196/21879 (2020).
Zopf, R., Polito, V. & Moore, J. Revisiting the hyperlink between physique and company: Visible motion congruency enhances intentional binding however isn’t body-specific. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18492-7 (2018).
Ma, Okay. & Hommel, B. The position of company for perceived possession within the digital hand phantasm. Aware. Cogn. 36, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.008 (2015).
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G. & Newen, A. I transfer, subsequently I’m: A brand new theoretical framework to analyze company and possession. Aware. Cogn. 17, 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.008 (2008).
Chung, Y.-C. et al. Cognition and motor studying in a Parkinson’s illness cohort: significance of recall in episodic reminiscence. NeuroReport 32, 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001707 (2021).
Kim, S. Bidirectional aggressive interactions between motor reminiscence and declarative reminiscence throughout interleaved studying. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64039-8 (2020).
Buch, E. R., Claudino, L., Quentin, R., Bönstrup, M. & Cohen, L. G. Consolidation of human talent linked to waking hippocampo-neocortical replay. Cell Rep. 35, 109193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109193 (2021).
Jacobacci, F. et al. Speedy hippocampal plasticity helps motor sequence studying. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 23898–23903. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009576117 (2020).
Pfeiffer, B. E. The content material of hippocampal “replay”. Hippocampus 30, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22824 (2020).
Seinfeld, S., Feuchtner, T., Pinzek, J. & Muller, J. Affect of data placement and consumer representations in VR on efficiency and embodiment. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Gr. 28, 1545–1556. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3021342 (2022).
Tambone, R. et al. Utilizing physique possession to modulate the motor system in stroke sufferers. Psychol. Sci. 32, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620975774 (2021).
Griffith, J. L., Voloschin, P., Gibb, G. D. & Bailey, J. R. Variations in eye-hand motor coordination of video-game customers and non-users. Percept. Mot. Expertise 57, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.155 (1983).
Harrington, D. L., Haaland, Okay. Y., Yeo, R. A. & Marder, E. Procedural reminiscence in Parkinson’s illness: Impaired motor however not visuoperceptual studying. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 12, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639008400978 (1990).
Hong, J.-Y., Gallanter, E., Müller-Oehring, E. M. & Schulte, T. Phases of procedural studying and reminiscence: Characterisation with perceptual-motor sequence duties. J. Cogn. Psychol. 31, 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1642897 (2019).
Oldfield, R. C. The evaluation and evaluation of handedness: The Edinburgh stock. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 (1971).
Choi, W., Lee, J., Yanagihara, N., Li, L. & Kim, J. Growth of a quantitative analysis system for visuo-motor management in three-dimensional digital actuality house. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31758-y (2018).
Mueller, S. T. & Piper, B. J. The psychology experiment constructing language (PEBL) and PEBL take a look at battery. J. Neurosci. Strategies 222, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024 (2014).
Gonzalez-Franco, M. & Peck, T. C. Avatar embodiment. In the direction of a standardized questionnaire. Entrance. Robotic. AI 5, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00074 (2018).
Heindel, W. C., Salmon, D. P., Shults, C. W., Walicke, P. A. & Butters, N. Neuropsychological proof for a number of implicit reminiscence programs: A comparability of Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s illness sufferers. J. Neurosci. 9, 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-02-00582.1989 (1989).
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. efficiency: An R bundle for evaluation, comparability and testing of statistical fashions. J. Open Supply Softw. 6, 3139 (2021).
Van der Hoort, B. & Ehrsson, H. H. Physique possession impacts visible notion of object measurement by rescaling the visible illustration of exterior house. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 1414–1428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0664-9 (2014).
Mohler, B. J., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B. & Bülthoff, H. H. The impact of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based digital setting. Presence 19, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.19.3.230 (2010).
Proffitt, D. R. & Linkenauger, S. A. Notion considered as a phenotypic expression. In Motion Science: Foundations of an Rising Self-discipline (eds Prinz, W. et al.) 171–197 (MIT Press, 2013).
Van Der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A. & Ehrsson, H. H. Being Barbie: The scale of 1’s personal physique determines the perceived measurement of the world. PLoS ONE 6, e20195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195 (2011).
Ogawa, N., Narumi, T. & Hirose, M. Digital hand realism impacts object measurement notion in body-based scaling. In 2019 IEEE Convention on Digital Actuality and 3D Consumer Interfaces (VR), 519–528. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798040 (2019).
Linkenauger, S. A., Bülthoff, H. H. & Mohler, B. J. Digital arm׳ s attain influences perceived distances however solely after expertise reaching. Neuropsychologia 70, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.034 (2015).
Yang, Z. et al. Influences of expertise and visible cues of digital arm on distance notion. i-Notion 11, 2041669519901134. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519901134 (2020).
Wamsley, E. J. Reminiscence consolidation throughout waking relaxation. Tendencies Cogn. Sci. 23, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.007 (2019).
Todorov, E., Shadmehr, R. & Bizzi, E. Augmented suggestions offered in a digital setting accelerates studying of a troublesome motor job. J. Mot. Behav. 29, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899709600829 (1997).
Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. & Blakemore, S.-J. An interference impact of noticed organic motion on motion. Curr. Biol. 13, 522–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9 (2003).
Keisler, A. & Shadmehr, R. A shared useful resource between declarative reminiscence and motor reminiscence. J. Neurosci. 30, 14817–14823. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4160-10.2010 (2010).
Della-Maggiore, V. & McIntosh, A. R. Time course of modifications in mind exercise and purposeful connectivity related to long-term adaptation to a rotational transformation. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2254–2262. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00984.2004 (2005).
Ren, J., Wu, Y. D., Chan, J. S. & Yan, J. H. Cognitive ageing impacts motor efficiency and studying. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 13, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00914.x (2013).
Anguera, J. A., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Willingham, D. T. & Seidler, R. D. Contributions of spatial working reminiscence to visuomotor studying. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1917–1930. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21351 (2010).
Taylor, J. A. & Ivry, R. B. Implicit and specific processes in motor studying. Motion Sci. Discovered. Emerg. Discip. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.000363-87 (2013).
Krakauer, J. W., Hadjiosif, A. M., Xu, J., Wong, A. L. & Haith, A. M. Motor studying. Compr Physiol 9, 613–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c170043 (2019).
Steed, A., Pan, Y., Zisch, F. & Steptoe, W. The affect of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive digital actuality. 2016 IEEE Digital Actuality (VR). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504689 (2016).
Tulving, E. Episodic reminiscence: From thoughts to mind. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 (2002).
Wang, L. et al. Intrinsic interhemispheric hippocampal purposeful connectivity predicts particular person variations in reminiscence efficiency potential. Hippocampus 20, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20771 (2010).
Giroux, M., Barra, J., Barraud, P.-A., Graff, C. & Guerraz, M. From embodiment of a point-light show in digital actuality to notion of 1’s personal actions. Neuroscience 416, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.043 (2019).
Fossataro, C., Tieri, G., Grollero, D., Bruno, V. & Garbarini, F. Hand blink reflex in digital actuality: The position of imaginative and prescient and proprioception in modulating defensive responses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 51, 937–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14601 (2020).
Liang, C. et al. Experiential possession and physique possession are totally different phenomena. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90014-y (2021).
Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H. III. & Paull, D. Altered imaginative and prescient close to the arms. Cognition 107, 1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006 (2008).
Gozli, D. G., West, G. L. & Pratt, J. Hand place alters imaginative and prescient by biasing processing via totally different visible pathways. Cognition 124, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.008 (2012).
Vahdat, S., Fogel, S., Benali, H. & Doyon, J. Community-wide reorganization of procedural reminiscence throughout NREM sleep revealed by fMRI. Elife 6, e24987. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24987 (2017).
Wenk, N. et al. Impact of immersive visualization applied sciences on cognitive load, motivation, usability, and embodiment. Digital Actuality https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00565-8 (2021).
Mousavi Hondori, H. et al. Selection of human–pc interplay mode in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore 30, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315593805 (2016).
Liebermann, D. G., Berman, S., Weiss, P. L. & Levin, M. F. Kinematics of reaching actions in a 2-D digital setting in adults with and with out stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20, 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206117 (2012).
