Rodenburg, T. B. et al. Welfare evaluation of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage programs: An on-farm comparability. Anim. Welf. 17, 363–373 (2008).
Lay, D. C. Jr. et al. Hen welfare in numerous housing programs. Poult. Sci. 90, 278–294 (2011).
Weeks, C. A., Brown, S. N., Richards, G. J., Wilkins, L. J. & Knowles, T. G. Ranges of mortality in hens by finish of lay on farm and in transit to slaughter in Nice Britain. Vet. Rec. 170, 647 (2012).
Fossum, O., Jansson, D. S., Etterlin, P. E. & Vågsholm, I. Causes of mortality in laying hens in numerous housing programs in 2001 to 2004. Acta Vet. Scand. 51, 3 (2009).
Graml, C., Niebuhr, Ok. & Waiblinger, S. Response of laying hens to people within the residence or a novel atmosphere. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113, 98–109 (2008).
Kujiyat, S. Ok., Craig, J. V. & Dayton, A. D. Period of tonic immobility affected by housing atmosphere in white leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 62, 2280–2282 (1983).
Colson, S., Arnould, C., Guémené, D. & Michel, V. in 6èmes Journées de la Recherche Avicole,. (ITAVI).
Koelkebeck, Ok. W., Amoss, M. S. J. & Cain, J. R. Manufacturing, physiological, and behavioral responses of laying hens in numerous administration environments. Poult. Sci. 66, 397–407 (1987).
Koelkebeck, Ok. W. & Cain, J. R. Efficiency, habits, plasma corticosterone, and financial returns of laying hens in a number of administration options. Poult. Sci. 63, 2123–2131 (1984).
Koelkebeck, Ok. W., Cain, J. R. & Amoss, M. S. J. Corticosterone sampling of laying hens in numerous administration programs. Poult. Sci. 65, 183–185 (1986).
Craig, J. V., Craig, J. A. & Vargas, J. V. Corticosteroids and different indicators of hens’ well-being in 4 laying-house environments. Poul. Sci. 65, 856–863 (1986).
Mench, J. A. Results of cage and ground pen administration on habits, manufacturing, and physiological stress responses of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 65, 1058–1069 (1986).
Campo, J. L., Prieto, M. T. & Dávila, S. G. Results of housing system and chilly stress on heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, fluctuating asymmetry, and tonic immobility length of chickens. Poult. Sci. 87, 621–626 (2008).
Shini, S. Physiological responses of laying hens to the choice housing programs. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2, 357–360 (2003).
Salamano, G. et al. Acute part proteins and heterophil: Lymphocyte ratio in laying hens in numerous housing programs. Vet. Rec. 167, 749–751 (2010).
Norwood, F. B. & Lusk, J. L. A calibrated auction-conjoint valuation methodology: Valuing pork and eggs produced beneath differing animal welfare circumstances. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 62, 80–94 (2011).
Wigley, P., Hulme, S. D., Bumstead, N. & Barrow, P. A. In vivo and in vitro research of genetic resistance to systemic salmonellosis within the rooster encoded by the SAL1 locus. Microbes Infect. 4, 1111–1120 (2002).
Humphrey, T. Are comfortable chickens safer chickens? Poultry welfare and illness susceptibility. Br. Poult. Sci. 47, 379–391 (2006).
Littin, Ok. E. & Cockrem, J. F. Particular person variation in corticosterone secretion in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 42, 536–546 (2001).
Nicol, C. J., Caplen, G., Edgar, J. & Browne, W. J. Associations between welfare indicators and environmental alternative in laying hens. Anim. Behav. 78, 413–424 (2009).
de Haas, E. N., Lee, C., Hernandez, C. E., Naguib, M. & Rodenburg, T. B. Particular person variations in character in laying hens are associated to studying a color cue affiliation. Behav. Proc. 134, 37–42 (2017).
Rufener, C. et al. Keel bone fractures are related to particular person mobility of laying hens in an aviary system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 217, 48–56 (2019).
Rufener, C., Baur, S., Stratmann, A. & Toscano, M. J. Keel bone fractures have an effect on egg laying efficiency however not egg high quality in laying hens housed in a business aviary system. Poult. Sci. 98, 1589–1600 (2018).
Rushen, J. The peck orders of home chickens: How do they develop and why are they linear?. Anim. Behav. 30, 1129–1137 (1982).
Jackson, M. E. & Waldroup, P. W. Analysis be aware: Impact of cage stage (tier) on the efficiency of white leghorn chickens. Poult. Sci. 66, 907–999 (1987).
El-lethey, H., Jungi, T. W. & Huber-Eicher, B. Results of feeding corticosterone and housing circumstances on feather pecking in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Physiol. Behav. 73, 243–251 (2001).
Eid, Y. Z., Ohtsuka, A. & Hayashi, Ok. Tea polyphenols cut back glucocorticoid-induced development inhibition and oxidative stress in broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44, 127–132 (2010).
Thaxton, J. P. & Puvadolpirod, S. Mannequin of physiological stress in chickens 5. Quantitative analysis. Poult. Sci. 79, 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.3.391 (2000).
Yang, X. J., Li, W. L., Feng, Y. & Yao, J. H. Results of immune stress on development efficiency, immunity, and cecal microflora in chickens. Poult. Sci. 90, 2740–2746 (2011).
Karaman, M. Impact of transport time on physique efficiency of broilers throughout transit to slaughter home. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8, 1555–1557 (2009).
Mindus, C. et al. in Poultry Science Affiliation (PSA) 107th Annual Assembly Vol. Poultry Science 97 43–44 (San Antonio, Texas, US, 2018).
Campo, J. L., Gil, M. G., Torres, O. & Davila, S. G. Affiliation between plumage situation and worry and stress ranges in 5 breeds of chickens. Poult. Sci. 80, 549–552 (2001).
Campo, J. L. & Prieto, M. J. Affiliation between plumage situation and fluctuating asymmetry and between feathers elimination, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tonic immobility length in chickens. Eur. Poult. Sci. 73, 250–256 (2009).
Na-Lampang, P. & Craig, J. V. Cage- and floor-rearing results on productiveness, nervousness, feather situation, and livability of white leghorn layers. Poult. Sci. 69, 902–909 (1990).
Ouart, M. D. & Adams, A. W. Results of cage design and fowl density on layers: 1. Productiveness, feathering, and nervousness. Poult. Sci. 61, 1606–1613 (1982).
Hansen, I., Braastad, B. O., Storbråten, J. & Tofastrud, M. Variations in fearfulness indicated by tonic immobility between laying hens in aviaries and in cages. Anim. Welf. 2, 105–112 (1993).
Bilcik, B. & Keeling, L. J. Adjustments in feather situation in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40, 444–451 (1999).
Bestman, M. & Wagenaar, J. Well being and welfare in Dutch natural laying hens. Animals (Basel) 4, 374–390 (2014).
Bradshaw, R. H. Particular person attributes as predictors of social standing in small teams of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34, 359–363 (1992).
Cloutier, S., Beaugrand, J. P. & Laguë, P. C. The function of particular person variations and patterns of decision within the formation of dominance orders in home hen triads. Behav. Proc. 38, 227–239 (1996).
Fabel, Ok. et al. Additive results of bodily train and environmental enrichment on grownup hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Entrance. Neurosci. 3, 50 (2009).
Zheng, J. et al. Grownup hippocampal neurogenesis alongside the dorsoventral axis contributes differentially to environmental enrichment mixed with voluntary train in assuaging power inflammatory ache in mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 37, 4145–4157 (2017).
Nakajima, S., Ohsawa, I., Ohta, S., Ohno, M. & Mikamic, T. Common voluntary train cures stress-induced impairment of cognitive perform and cell proliferation accompanied by will increase in cerebral IGF-1 and GST exercise in mice. Behav. Mind Res. 211, 178–184 (2010).
Kiuchi, T., Lee, H. & Mikamia, T. Common train cures depression-like habits by way of VEGF-Flk-1 signaling in chronically harassed mice. Neuroscience 207, 208–217 (2012).
Kim, J. et al. Sexual exercise counteracts the suppressive results of power stress on grownup hippocampal neurogenesis and recognition reminiscence. Mind Res. 1538, 26–40 (2013).
Veena, J. et al. Enriched atmosphere restores hippocampal cell proliferation and ameliorates cognitive deficits in chronically harassed rats. J. Neurosci. Res. 87, 831–843 (2008).
Veena, J., Srikumar, B. N., Raju, T. R. & Shankaranarayana Rao, B. S. Publicity to enriched atmosphere restores the survival and differentiation of latest born cells within the hippocampus and ameliorates depressive signs in chronically harassed rats. Neurosci. Lett. 455, 178–182 (2009).
Romero-Grimaldi, C. et al. Stress will increase the destructive results of power ache on hippocampal neurogenesis. Anesth. Analg. 121, 1078–1088 (2015).
Rao, M. S. & Shetty, A. Ok. Efficacy of doublecortin as a marker to analyse absolutely the quantity and dendritic development of newly generated neurons within the grownup dentate gyrus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 234–246 (2004).
Couillard-Despres, S. et al. Doublecortin expression ranges in grownup mind mirror neurogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 1–14 (2005).
Alvarez-Buylla, A., Theelen, M. & Nottebohm, F. Proliferation, “sizzling spots” in grownup avian ventricular zone reveal radial cell division. Neuron 5, 101–109 (1990).
Balthazart, J., Boseret, G., Konkle, A. T., Hurley, L. L. & Ball, G. F. Doublecortin as a marker of grownup neuroplasticity within the canary track management nucleus HVC. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24, 801–817 (2008).
Vellema, M., Hertel, M., Urbanus, S. L., Van der Linden, A. & Gahr, M. Evaluating the predictive worth of doublecortin as a marker for grownup neurogenesis in canaries (Serinus canaria). J. Comput. Neurol. 522, 1299–1315 (2014).
Balthazart, J. & Ball, G. F. Doublecortin is a extremely beneficial endogenous marker of grownup neurogenesis in canaries. Mind Behav. Evolut. 84, 1–4 (2014).
Balthazart, J. & Ball, G. F. Endogenous versus exogenous markers of grownup neurogenesis in canaries and different birds: Benefits and downsides. J. Comput. Neurol. 522, 4100–4120 (2014).
Gualtieri, F. et al. Unpredictable power gentle stress suppresses the incorporation of latest neurons on the caudal pole of the rooster hippocampal formation. Sci. Rep. 9, 7129 (2019).
Armstrong, E. A. et al. Keel bone fractures induce a depressive-like state in laying hens. Sci. Rep. 10, 3007 (2020).
Robertson, B. et al. Meals restriction reduces neurogenesis within the avian hippocampal formation. PLoS ONE 12, e0189158 (2017).
Weber, M. D., Godbout, J. P. & Sheridan, J. F. Repeated social defeat, neuroinflammation, and habits: Monocytes carry the sign. Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 46–61 (2016).
Wigley, P. et al. Macrophages remoted from chickens genetically resistant or prone to systemic salmonellosis present magnitudinal and temporal differential expression of cytokines and chemokines following salmonella enterica problem. Infect. Immun. 74, 1425–1430 (2006).
Shini, S., Huff, G. R., Shini, A. & Kaiser, P. Understanding stress-induced immunosuppression: Exploration of cytokine and chemokine gene profiles in rooster peripheral leukocytes. Poult. Sci. 89, 841–851 (2010).
Madison, A. & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. Ok. Stress, melancholy, weight-reduction plan, and the intestine microbiota: Human–micro organism interactions on the core of psychoneuroimmunology and diet. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 28, 105–110 (2019).
Maltz, R. M. et al. Extended restraint stressor publicity in outbred CD-1 mice impacts microbiota, colonic irritation, and quick chain fatty acids. PLoS ONE 13, e0196961 (2018).
Wigley, P. Blurred traces: Pathogens, commensals, and the wholesome intestine. Entrance. Vet. Sci. 2, 40 (2015).
Awad, W. A., Hess, C. & Hess, M. Re-thinking the chicken-campylobacter jejuni interplay: A evaluate. Avian Pathol. 47, 352–363 (2018).
Dennis, R. L. Adrenergic and noradrenergic regulation of poultry habits and manufacturing. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 56(Suppl), S94-100 (2016).
Birkl, P. et al. Variations in cecal microbiome of chosen excessive and low feather-pecking laying hens. Poult. Sci. 97, 3009–3014 (2018).
van der Eijk, J. A. J. et al. Variations in intestine microbiota composition of laying hen traces divergently chosen on feather pecking. Poult. Sci. 98, 7009–7021 (2019).
Shi, S. et al. Evaluation of high-throughput sequencing for cecal microbiota range and performance in hens beneath totally different rearing programs. 3 Biotech 9, 438 (2019).
Casey-Trott, T. et al. Strategies for evaluation of keel bone injury in poultry. Poult. Sci. 94, 2339–2350 (2015).
RSPCA. RSPCA welfare requirements for Pullets (laying hens), https://science.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/farmanimals/requirements/pullets (2018).
Puelles, L. The Chick Mind in Stereotaxic Coordinates: An Atlas That includes Neuromeric Subdivisions and Mammalian Homologies (Tutorial Press, 2007).
Boseret, G., Ball, G. F. & Balthazart, J. The microtubule-associated protein doublecortin is broadly expressed within the telencephalon of grownup canaries. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 33, 140–154 (2007).
Armstrong, E. A. et al. Cell proliferation within the grownup rooster hippocampus correlates with particular person variations in time spent in outside areas and tonic immobility. Entrance. Vet. Sci. 7, 587 (2020).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. World patterns of 16S rRNA range at a depth of hundreds of thousands of sequences per pattern. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
D’Amore, R. et al. A complete benchmarking research of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA neighborhood profiling. BMC Genom. 17, 1–20 (2016).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome knowledge science utilizing QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Actual sequence variants ought to substitute operational taxonomic models in marker-gene knowledge evaluation. ISME J. 11, 2639–2643 (2017).
Mcdonald, D. et al. The organic statement matrix (BIOM) format or: How I realized to cease worrying and love the ome. GigaScience 1, 7 (2012).
Yilmaz, P. et al. The SILVA and “all-species residing tree undertaking (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 643–648 (2014).
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 1–17 (2018).
Katoh, Ok. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT a number of sequence alignment software program model 7: Enhancements in efficiency and usefulness article quick observe. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Value, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—Roughly maximum-likelihood bushes for giant alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Religion, D. P. Conservation analysis and phylogenetic range. Biol. Cons. 61, 1–10 (1992).
Martino, C. et al. A novel sparse compositional approach reveals microbial perturbations. MSystems 4, e00016-19 (2019).
Morton, J. T. et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement requirements with reference frames. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Fedarko, M. W. et al. Visualizing ’omic characteristic rankings and log-ratios utilizing Qurro. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa023 (2020).
Worldwide, H.-L. Hy-Line Brown Administration Information, http://www.hy-line.co.uk/uploadedfiles/1518531754-brown_com_guide_eng.pdf (2016).
Worldwide, H. N. Nick Chick New Administration Information, https://hn-int.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/nick-chick.pdf (2020).
Rychlik, I. Composition and performance of rooster intestine microbiota. Animals 10, 103 (2020).
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S. & Gordon, J. I. Human intestine microbes related to weight problems. Nature 444, 1022–1023 (2006).
Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Regulation of the stress response by the intestine microbiota: Implications for psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37, 1369–1378 (2012).
Soni, J. L., Adaval, S. C. & Kolte, G. N. Preliminary observations on anaemia, splenomegaly and chilly agglutinin manufacturing throughout acute avian spirochaetosis. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 50, 1110–1113 (1980).
Smyth, J. A. & McNamee, P. T. in Poultry Ailments (eds F. Jordan, M. Pattison, D. Alexander, & T. Faragher) 191–199 (Elsevier, 2001).
Zimomra, Z. R., Porterfield, V. M., Camp, R. M. & Johnson, J. D. Time-dependent mediators of HPA axis activation following reside Escherichia coli. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 301, R1648-1657 (2011).
Ramirez, Ok., Niraula, A. & Sheridan, J. F. GABAergic modulation with classical benzodiazepines forestall stress-induced neuro-immune dysregulation and behavioral alterations. Mind Behav. Immun. 51, 154–168 (2016).
Emami, N. Ok., Greene, E. S., Kogut, M. H. & Dridi, S. Warmth stress and feed restriction distinctly have an effect on efficiency, carcass and meat yield, intestinal integrity, and inflammatory (chemo)cytokines in broiler chickens. Entrance. Physiol. 12, 1148 (2021).
Hangalapura, B. N., Kaiser, M. G., van der Poel, J. J., Parmentier, H. Ok. & Lamont, S. J. Chilly stress equally enhances in vivo pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression in rooster traces divergently chosen for antibody responses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 30, 503–511 (2006).
Asif, M. et al. Interleukin-6 expression after infectious bronchitis virus an infection in chickens. Viral Immunol. 20, 479–486 (2007).
Petra, A. et al. Intestine-microbiota-brain axis and its impact on neuropsychiatric issues with suspected immune dysregulation. Clin. Ther. 37, 984–995 (2015).
Bailey, M. T., Dowd, S. E. & Galley, J. D. Publicity to a social stressor alters the construction of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Mind Behav. Immun. 25, 397–407 (2011).
Lyte, M., Li, W., Opitz, N., Gaykema, R. P. A. & Goehlerd, L. E. Induction of anxiety-like habits in mice in the course of the preliminary phases of an infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiol. Behav. 89, 350–357 (2006).
Heijtz, R. D. et al. Regular intestine microbiota modulates mind improvement and habits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3047–3052 (2011).
Sudo, N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization packages the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).
Johnson, Ok. A. & Johnson, D. E. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 2483–2492 (1995).
Mappley, L. J., La Ragione, R. M. & Woodward, M. J. Brachyspira and its function in avian intestinal spirochaetosis. Vet. Microbiol. 31, 245–260 (2014).
Dawkins, M. S. Elusive idea of most popular group dimension in home hens. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8, 365–375 (1982).
Weeks, C. A. & Nicol, C. J. Behavioural wants, priorities and preferences of laying hens. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 62, 296–307 (2006).
Shiny, A. & Johnson, E. A. Smothering in business free-range laying hens: A preliminary investigation. Vet. Rec. 168, 512 (2011).
Michel, V. & Huonnic, D. A comparability of welfare, well being and manufacturing efficiency of laying hens reared in cages or in aviaries. Br. Poult. Sci. 44, 775–776 (2003).
Mazaheri, A., Lierz, M. & Hafez, H. M. Investigation on the pathogenicity of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in laying hens. Avian Dis. 49, 574–576 (2005).
Patel, S. N., Clayton, N. S. & Krebs, J. R. Spatial studying induces neurogenesis within the avian mind. Behav. Mind Res. 89, 115–128 (1997).
LaDage, L. D., Roth, T. C., Fox, R. A. & Pravosudov, V. V. Ecologically-relevant spatial reminiscence use modulates hippocampal neurogenesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1071–1079 (2010).
Medvecky, M. et al. Complete genome sequencing and performance prediction of 133 intestine anaerobes remoted from rooster caecum in pure cultures. BMC Genom. 19, 561 (2018).
Kubasova, T. et al. Contact with grownup hen impacts improvement of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks. PLoS ONE 14, e0212446 (2019).
Richards, P., Fothergill, J., Bernardeau, M. & Wigley, P. Improvement of the caecal microbiota in three broiler breeds. Entrance. Vet. Sci. 6, 201 (2019).
Pedroso, A. A., Menten, J. F. M. & Lambais, M. R. The construction of bacterial neighborhood within the intestines of newly hatched chicks. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 14, 232–237 (2005).
FAWC. Vol. Report 1 (ed Meals & Rural Affairs Division for Setting), https://www.gov.uk/authorities/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319292/Farm_Animal_Welfare_in_Great_Britain_-_Past__Present_and_Future.pdf.,2009
