Barton, L. L. & Hamilton, W. A. Sulphate-reducing Micro organism: Environmental And Engineered Techniques. (Cambridge College Press, Cambridge, 2007).
Rabus, R. et al. A post-genomic view of the ecophysiology, catabolism and biotechnological relevance of sulphate-reducing prokaryotes. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 66, 55–321 (2015).
Rückert, C. Sulfate discount in microorganisms — latest advances and biotechnological functions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 33, 140–146 (2016).
Venceslau, S. S., Stockdreher, Y., Dahl, C. & Pereira, I. A. C. The “bacterial heterodisulfide” DsrC is a key protein in dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837, 1148–1164 (2014).
Santos, A. A. et al. A protein trisulfide {couples} dissimilatory sulfate discount to vitality conservation. Science 350, 1541–1545 (2015).
Bradley, A. S., Leavitt, W. D. & Johnston, D. T. Revisiting the dissimilatory sulfate discount pathway. Geobiology 9, 446–457 (2011).
Leavitt, W. D., Bradley, A. S., Santos, A. A., Pereira, I. A. C. & Johnston, D. T. Sulfur isotope results of dissimilatory sulfite reductase. Entrance. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01392 (2015).
Koschorreck, M. Microbial sulphate discount at a low pH microbial sulphate discount at a low pH. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64, 329–342 (2008).
Chang, Y. J. et al. Variety and characterization of sulfate-reducing micro organism in groundwater at a uranium mill tailings web site. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 3149–3160 (2001).
Friedrich, M. W. Phylogenetic evaluation reveals a number of lateral transfers of adenosine-5’-phosphosulfate reductase genes amongst sulfate-reducing microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 184, 278–289 (2002).
Meyer, B. & Kuever, J. Molecular evaluation of the variety of sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes within the atmosphere, utilizing aprA as purposeful marker gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 7664–7679 (2007).
Watanabe, T., Kojima, H., Takano, Y. & Fukui, M. Variety of sulfur-cycle prokaryotes in freshwater lake sediments investigated utilizing aprA because the purposeful marker gene. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 36, 436–443 (2013).
Vigneron, A. et al. Past the tip of the iceberg; a brand new view of the variety of sulfite- and sulfate-reducing microorganisms. ISME J. 12, 2096–2099 (2018).
Anantharaman, Ok. et al. Expanded variety of microbial teams that form the dissimilatory sulfur cycle. ISME J. 12, 1715–1728 (2018).
Hausmann, B. et al. Peatland Acidobacteria with a dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. ISME J. 12, 1729–1742 (2018).
Martins, P. D. et al. Viral and metabolic controls on excessive charges of microbial sulfur and carbon biking in wetland ecosystems. Microbiome https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0522-4 (2018).
Bell, E. et al. Lively sulfur biking within the terrestrial deep subsurface. ISME J. 14, 1260–1272 (2020).
Colman, D. R. et al. Phylogenomic evaluation of novel Diaforarchaea is per sulfite however not sulfate discount in volcanic environments on early Earth. ISME J. 14, 1316–1331 (2020).
Turaev, D. & Rattei, T. Excessive definition for techniques biology of microbial communities: metagenomics will get genome-centric and strain-resolved. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 39, 174–181 (2016).
Raghoebarsing, A. A. et al. A microbial consortium {couples} anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440, 918–921 (2006).
Wrighton, Ok. C. et al. Metabolic interdependencies between phylogenetically novel fermenters and respiratory organisms in an unconfined aquifer. ISME J. 8, 1452–1463 (2014).
Brown, C. T. et al. Uncommon biology throughout a gaggle comprising greater than 15% of area Micro organism. Nature 523, 208–211 (2015).
Ljung, Ok., Maley, F., Cook dinner, A. & Weinstein, P. Acid sulfate soils and human well being — a millennium ecosystem evaluation. Environ. Int. 35, 1234–1242 (2009).
Dolla, A., Fournier, M. & Dermoun, Z. Oxygen protection in sulfate-reducing micro organism. J. Biotechnol. 126, 87–100 (2006).
Canfield, D. E. & Des Marais, D. J. Cardio sulfate discount in microbial mats. Science 251, 1471–1473 (1991).
Minz, D. et al. Sudden inhabitants distribution in a microbial mat neighborhood: sulfate-reducing micro organism localized to the extremely oxic chemocline in distinction to a eukaryotic choice for anoxia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4659–4665 (1999).
Schoeffler, M. et al. Progress of an anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacterium sustained by oxygen respiratory vitality conservation after O2-driven experimental evolution. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 360–373 (2019).
Fortin, D. & Praharaj, T. Function of microbial exercise in Fe and S biking in sub-oxic to anoxic sulfide-rich mine tailings. J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 6, 39–42 (2005).
Winch, S., Mills, H. J., Kostka, J. E., Fortin, D. & Lean, D. R. S. Identification of sulfate-reducing micro organism in methylmercury-contaminated mine tailings by evaluation of SSU rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68, 94–107 (2009).
Yang, T. T. et al. Adjustments in microbial neighborhood composition following phytostabilization of a particularly acidic Cu mine tailings. Soil Biol. Biochem. 114, 52–58 (2017).
Liang, J. L. et al. Novel phosphate-solubilizing micro organism improve soil phosphorus biking following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining. ISME J. 14, 1600–1613 (2020).
Kludze, H. Ok., DeLaune, R. D. & Patrick, W. H. Jr. Aerenchyma formation and methane and oxygen trade in rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 386–391 (1993).
Eichorst, S. A. et al. Genomic insights into the Acidobacteria reveal methods for his or her success in terrestrial environments. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 1041–1063 (2018).
García-Fraile, P., Benada, O., Cajthaml, T., Baldrian, P. & Lladód, S. Terracidiphilus gabretensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an considerable and energetic forest soil acidobacterium necessary in natural matter transformation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 560–569 (2016).
Cypionka, H., Widdel, F. & Pfennig, N. Survival of sulfate-reducing micro organism after oxygen stress, and progress in sulfate-free oxygen-sulfide gradients. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1, 39–45 (1985).
Greening, C. et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution point out H2 is a broadly utilised vitality supply for microbial progress and survival. ISME J. 10, 761–777 (2016).
Ud-Din, A. I. M. S. & Roujeinikova, A. Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins: a core sensing ingredient in prokaryotes and archaea. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 74, 3293–3303 (2017).
Wuichet, Ok. & Zhulin, I. B. Origins and diversification of a posh sign transduction system in prokaryotes. Sci. Sign https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000724 (2010).
Ray, J. et al. Exploring the position of CheA3 in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough motility. Entrance. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00077 (2014).
Liu, R. Y. & Ochman, H. Stepwise formation of the bacterial flagellar system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7116–7121 (2007).
Wall, D. & Kaiser, D. Sort IV pili and cell motility. Mol. Microbiol. 32, 1–10 (1999).
Crispim, J. S. et al. Screening and characterization of prophages in Desulfovibrio genomes. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27423-z (2018).
Dörries, M., Wohlbrand, L., Kube, M., Reinhardt, R. & Rabus, R. Genome and catabolic subproteomes of the marine, nutritionally versatile, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfococcus multivorans DSM 2059. BMC Genomics https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3236-7 (2016).
Roux, S., Enault, F., Hurwitz, B. L. & Sullivan, M. B. VirSorter: mining viral sign from microbial genomic knowledge. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.985 (2015).
Jang, H. B. et al. Taxonomic project of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 632–639 (2019).
Šimoliūnas, E. et al. Klebsiella phage vB_KleM-RaK2 — a large singleton of the household Myoviridae. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060717 (2013).
Silva, I. R., Jers, C., Meyer, A. S. & Mikkelsen, J. D. Rhamnogalacturonan I modifying enzymes: an replace. N. Biotechnol. 33, 41–54 (2016).
Cohen-Kupiec, R. & Chet, I. The molecular biology of chitin digestion. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9, 270–277 (1998).
Upadhyay, A. A., Fleetwood, A. D., Adebali, O., Finn, R. D. & Zhulin, I. B. Cache domains which are homologous to, however totally different from PAS domains comprise the biggest superfamily of extracellular sensors in prokaryotes. PLoS Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004862 (2016).
Zeng, L. & Burne, R. A. Sucrose-and fructose-specific results on the transcriptome of Streptococcus mutans, as decided by RNA sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 146–156 (2016).
Flieder, M. et al. Novel taxa of Acidobacteriota implicated in seafloor sulfur biking. ISME J. 15, 3159–3180 (2021).
Lombard, V., Ramulu, H. G., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495 (2014).
Colleran, E., Finnegan, S. & Lens, P. Anaerobic therapy of sulphate-containing waste streams. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 67, 29–46 (1995).
Vignais, P. M. & Billoud, B. Prevalence, classification, and organic perform of hydrogenases: an outline. Chem. Rev. 107, 4206–4272 (2007).
Heidelberg, J. F. et al. The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 554–559 (2004).
Emerson, J. B. et al. Host-linked soil viral ecology alongside a permafrost thaw gradient. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 870–880 (2018).
Parikka, Ok. J., Le Romancer, M., Wauters, N. & Jacquet, S. Deciphering the virus-to-prokaryote ratio (VPR): insights into virus-host relationships in a wide range of ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 92, 1081–1100 (2017).
Anantharaman, Ok. et al. Sulfur oxidation genes in various deep-sea viruses. Science 344, 757–760 (2014).
Roux, S. et al. Ecology and evolution of viruses infecting uncultivated SUP05 micro organism as revealed by single-cell- and meta- genomics. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03125 (2014).
Jin, M. et al. Diversities and potential biogeochemical impacts of mangrove soil viruses. Microbiome https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0675-9 (2019).
Howard, M. B., Ekborg, N. A., Weiner, R. M. & Hutcheson, S. W. Detection and characterization of chitinases and different chitin-modifying enzymes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 627–635 (2003).
Dinsdale, E. A. et al. Purposeful metagenomic profiling of 9 biomes. Nature 452, 629–632 (2008).
Wang, X. X. et al. Cryptic prophages assist micro organism address opposed environments. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1146 (2010).
Sharon, I. et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial traits inside oceanic viral communities. ISME J. 5, 1178–1190 (2011).
Praharaj, T. & Fortin, D. Indicators of microbial sulfate discount in acidic sulfide-rich mine tailings. Geomicrobiol. J. 21, 457–467 (2004).
Morris, R. L. & Schmidt, T. M. Shallow respiration: bacterial life at low O2. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 205–212 (2013).
Lamrabet, O. et al. Oxygen discount within the strict anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough: characterization of two membrane-bound oxygen reductases. Microbiology 157, 2720–2732 (2011).
Kieft, Ok. & Anantharaman, Ok. Deciphering energetic prophages from metagenomes. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00084-22 (2022).
Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a brand new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).
Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an environment friendly device for precisely reconstructing single genomes from complicated microbial communities. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1165 (2015).
Parks, D. H. et al. Restoration of almost 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes considerably expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the standard of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation web site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 1–11 (2010).
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology useful resource based mostly on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2019).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Quick and delicate protein alignment utilizing DIAMOND. Nat. Strategies 12, 59–60 (2015).
Hunter, S. et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D211–D215 (2009).
Müller, A. L., Kjeldsen, Ok. U., Rattei, T., Pester, M. & Loy, A. Phylogenetic and environmental variety of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi) sulfite reductases. ISME J. 9, 1152–1165 (2015).
Tan, S. et al. Insights into ecological position of a brand new deltaproteobacterial order Candidatus Acidulodesulfobacterales by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. ISME J. 13, 2044–2057 (2019).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a number of sequence alignment with excessive accuracy and excessive throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a device for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML model 8: a device for phylogenetic evaluation and post-analysis of huge phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life v2: on-line annotation and show of phylogenetic timber made straightforward. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W475–W478 (2011).
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key options in protein buildings with the brand new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).
Parks, D. H. et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based mostly on genome phylogeny considerably revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996–1004 (2018).
Segata, N., Börnigen, D., Morgan, X. C. & Huttenhower, C. PhyloPhlAn is a brand new technique for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3304 (2013).
Yin, Y. B. et al. dbCAN: an internet useful resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W445–W451 (2012).
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 (2011).
Brioukhanov, A. L. & Netrusov, A. I. Aerotolerance of strictly anaerobic microorganisms and elements of protection towards oxidative stress: a assessment. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 43, 567–582 (2007).
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 net portal for protein modeling, prediction and evaluation. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).
Chen, S. F., Zhou, Y. Q., Chen, Y. R. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, 884–890 (2018).
Kopylova, E., Noe, L. & Touzet, H. SortMeRNA: quick and correct filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic knowledge. Bioinformatics 28, 3211–3217 (2012).
