UNDP. COVID-19 and human improvement: Assessing the disaster, envisioning the restoration. in 2020 Human Growth Views. Edited by Programme UND; 2020.
Agha, S. Psychological well-being and affiliation of the 4 components coping construction mannequin: A perspective of individuals dwelling in lockdown throughout COVID-19. Ethics Med. Public Well being 16, 100605 (2021).
Nations U. UN leads name to guard most susceptible from psychological well being disaster throughout and after COVID-19. UN Information 2020.
Jeong, H. et al. Psychological well being standing of individuals remoted on account of Center East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol. Well being 38, e2016048 (2016).
Hossain, M., Patwary, M.M., Sultana, R., Browning, M.H. Psychological misery amongst healthcare professionals throughout the early levels of the COVID-19 outbreak in low useful resource settings: A cross-sectional research in Bangladesh. Entrance. Public Well being. 1742 (2021).
Patwary, M.M., Bardhan, M., Disha, A.S., Kabir, M.P., Hossain, M.R., Alam, M.A., Haque, M.Z., Billah, S.M., Browning, M., Kabir, R. et al. Psychological well being standing of college college students and dealing professionals throughout the early stage of COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being. 19(11) (2022).
Jain, A., Bodicherla, Ok. P., Raza, Q. & Sahu, Ok. Ok. Affect on psychological well being by “Residing in Isolation and Quarantine” throughout COVID-19 pandemic. J. Household Med. Major Care 9(10), 5415 (2020).
Cavicchioli, M. et al. What would be the affect of the COVID-19 quarantine on psychological misery? Issues primarily based on a scientific evaluation of pandemic outbreaks. Healthcare (Basel) 9(1), 101 (2021).
Sheek-Hussein, M., Abu-Zidan, F. M. & Stip, E. Catastrophe administration of the psychological affect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 14(1), 19–19 (2021).
Boden, M. et al. Addressing the psychological well being affect of COVID-19 by inhabitants well being. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 85, 102006–102006 (2021).
Simon, J., Helter, T. M., White, R. G., van der Boor, C. & Łaszewska, A. Impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown and related vulnerabilities on functionality well-being, psychological well being and social assist: An Austrian survey research. BMC Public Well being 21(1), 314 (2021).
Kola, L. et al. COVID-19 psychological well being affect and responses in low-income and middle-income international locations: reimagining world psychological well being. Lancet Psychiatry. 8(6), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00025-0 (2021).
Reid, J.M.Ok., Siepmann, I., Mason-Jones, A., Simon, J. (ASPHER COVID-19 Activity Power): Constructing forwards pretty 2022–2032: What can we study from COVID-19’s unequal and unjust losses in Europe? in Second ASPHER Assertion on the Pandemic Impacts on Well being Inequalities in Deprived Weak Populations within the European Area. (2022).
Power AC-T. What are the COVID-19 Lockdown-induced diseases and why ought to European public well being methods be investigating their epidemiology, remedy, and prevention? (2020).
Prati, G. & Mancini, A. D. The psychological affect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: A evaluation and meta-analysis of longitudinal research and pure experiments. Psychol. Med. 51(2), 201–211 (2021).
Jolly, T.S., Pandian, G., Batchelder, E., Jain, A. Posttraumatic stress dysfunction exacerbation on account of public masking in occasions of COVID-19. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 22(6) (2020).
Laboe, C. W., Jain, A., Bodicherla, Ok. P. & Pathak, M. Doctor suicide within the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus 13(11), e19313 (2021).
Sabat, I. et al. United however divided: Coverage responses and other people’s perceptions within the EU throughout the COVID-19 outbreak. Well being Coverage 124(9), 909–918 (2020).
Moshammer, H., Poteser, M., Lemmerer, Ok., Wallner, P., Hutter, H.P. Time course of COVID-19 instances in Austria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being. 17(9) (2020).
Nagel, A., Łaszewska, A., Haidinger, G. & Simon, J. The primary 8 weeks of the Austrian SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 133(7-8), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01804-9 (2021).
Łaszewska, A., Helter, T. & Simon, J. Perceptions of COVID-19 lockdowns and associated public well being measures in Austria: A longitudinal on-line survey. BMC Public Well being 21(1), 1502 (2021).
Yuan, Ok., Gong, Y.M., Liu, L., Solar, Y.Ok., Tian, S.S., Wang, Y.J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, A.Y., Su, S.Z., Liu, X.X. et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress dysfunction after infectious illness pandemics within the twenty-first century, together with COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic evaluation. Mol. Psychiatry. (2021).
Richter, D., Riedel-Heller, S. & Zürcher, S. J. Psychological well being issues within the common inhabitants throughout and after the primary lockdown part as a result of SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Speedy evaluation of multi-wave research. Epidemiol. Psychiatric Sci. 30, e27 (2021).
Liu, S., Heinz, A., Haucke, M.N., Heinzel, S. The worldwide affect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care provision for folks with psychological well being issues. Nervenarzt. 1–5 (2021).
White, R.G., Imperiale, M.G., Perera, E. The capabilities method: Fostering contexts for enhancing psychological well being and wellbeing throughout the globe. World. Well being. 12(1) (2016).
Sen, A. Commodities and capabilities. (North-Holland Sole distributors for the united statesA. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., 1985).
Sen, A. Growth as Freedom (Oxford College Press, 1999).
Probst, T., Budimir, S. & Pieh, C. Melancholy in and after COVID-19 lockdown in Austria and the function of stress and loneliness in lockdown: A longitudinal research. J. Have an effect on. Disord. 277, 962–963 (2020).
Middleton, J., Lopes, H., Michelson, Ok. & Reid, J. Planning for a second wave pandemic of COVID-19 and planning for winter. Int. J. Public Well being 65(9), 1525–1527 (2020).
Simon, J. A. P., Grey, A., Rugkasa, J., Yeeles, Ok. & Burns, T. Operationalising the aptitude method for end result measurement in psychological well being analysis. Social Sci. Med. 98, 187–196 (2013).
Simon, J., Łaszewska, A., Leutner, E., Spiel, G., Churchman, D., Mayer, S. Cultural and linguistic transferability of the multi-dimensional OxCAP-MH functionality instrument for end result measurement in psychological well being: The German language model. BMC Psychiatry. 18(1) (2018).
Vergunst, F., Jenkinson, C., Burns, T., Anand, P., Grey, A., Rugkåsa, J., Simon, J. Psychometric validation of a multi-dimensional functionality instrument for end result measurement in psychological well being analysis (OxCAP-MH). Well being Qual. Life Outcomes. 15(1) (2017).
Łaszewska, A. et al. Measuring broader wellbeing in psychological well being providers: Validity of the German language OxCAP-MH functionality instrument. Qual. Life Res. 28(8), 2311–2323 (2019).
Snaith, R. P. & Zigmond, A. S. The hospital nervousness and melancholy scale. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 292(6516), 344 (1986).
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T. & Neckelmann, D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiousness and Melancholy Scale. An up to date literature evaluation. J. Psychosom. Res. 52(2), 69–77 (2002).
WHO. Wellbeing measures in main well being care/The Depcare Venture. Report on a WHO Assembly. Copenhagen (1998).
Topp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S. & Bech, P. The WHO-5 Effectively-Being Index: A scientific evaluation of the literature. Psychother. Psychosom. 84(3), 167–176 (2015).
Garland, A. F. et al. Use of the WHO’s Perceived Effectively-Being Index (WHO-5) as an environment friendly and doubtlessly legitimate display for melancholy in a low earnings nation. Fam. Syst. Well being 36, 148–158 (2018).
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. & Farley, G. Ok. The multidimensional scale of perceived social assist. J. Pers. Assess. 52(1), 30–41 (1988).
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software program: Launch 16 (StataCorp LLC, 2019).
Tsamakis, Ok. et al. COVID-19 and its penalties on psychological well being (Assessment). Exp. Ther. Med. 21(3), 244–244 (2021).
Abbott A. COVID’s mental-health toll: how scientists are monitoring a surge in melancholy. Nature. 590(7845), 194–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00175-z (2021).
Wu, T. et al. Prevalence of psychological well being issues throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: A scientific evaluation and meta-analysis. J. Have an effect on. Disord. 281, 91–98 (2021).
Pieh C, Dale R, Plener PL, Humer E, Probst T. Stress ranges in high-school college students after a semester of home-schooling. Eur Little one Adolesc Psychiatry. 16, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01826-2 (2021).
Stieger S, Lewetz D, Swami V. Emotional Effectively-Being Below Circumstances of Lockdown: An Expertise Sampling Examine in Austria Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Happiness Stud. 22(6), 2703–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00337-2 (2021).
Stolz E, Mayerl H, Freidl W. The affect of COVID-19 restriction measures on loneliness amongst older adults in Austria. Eur J Public Well being. 31(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa238 (2021).
Kittel, B. Die Entsolidarisierung der Gesellschaft: Vom ersten in den zweiten Lockdown. (2020).
Kittel, B., Kritzinger, S., Boomgaarden, H., Prainsack, B., Eberl, J.-M., Kalleitner, F., Lebernegg, N.S., Partheymüller, J., Plescia, C., Schiestl, D.W. et al. The Austrian Corona Panel Venture: Monitoring particular person and societal dynamics amidst the COVID-19 disaster. Eur Polit Sci 20, 318–344. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00294-7 (2021).
Bradbury-Jones, C. & Isham, L. The pandemic paradox: The results of COVID-19 on home violence. J. Clin. Nurs. 29(13–14), 2047–2049 (2020).
Sacco, M. A. et al. The affect of the COVID-19 pandemic on home violence: The darkish facet of residence isolation throughout quarantine. Med. Leg. J. 88(2), 71–73 (2020).
Brickman, P., Campbell, D.T., Appley, M.H. Adaptation degree concept: A symposium. (1971).
Pieh, C., Budimir, S., Humer, E., Probst, T. Evaluating psychological well being throughout COVID-19 lockdown and 6 months later in Austria: A longitudinal research. (2020).
Fayaz Farkhad, B. & Albarracín, D. Insights on the implications of COVID-19 mitigation measures for psychological well being. Econ. Hum. Biol. 40, 100963 (2021).
Devaux, M. & Sassi, F. Social disparities in hazardous alcohol use: Self-report bias might result in incorrect estimates. Eur. J. Public Well being 26(1), 129–134 (2016).
Mulder, J., de Bruijne, M. Willingness of on-line respondents to take part in different modes of knowledge assortment. Survey Apply. 12(1) (2019).
Yetter, G. & Capaccioli, Ok. Variations in responses to Internet and paper surveys amongst college professionals. Behav. Res. Strategies 42(1), 266–272 (2010).
